Meeting Reports should summarize the major themes of a meeting, symposium, or workshop. They synthesize key themes across multiple speakers and underscore consensus around key ideas. Meeting reports should focus on the key developments presented at the meeting as well as new discoveries relevant to measurement instruments, changes in best practices regarding measurement and the use of measurement instruments, and the application of recently gained knowledge in the social sciences. For large meetings it is preferable that more in-depth information is given on a few selected topics, rather than a brief account of everything presented. Meeting reports that cover the activities of specific task forces liaised with scientific organizations should deal with issues pertaining to measurement in the social sciences, and ideally portray any consensus reached as well as areas of disagreement. Controversial or challenging issues that remain to be studied and investigated are to be underscored as directions for the future. Fitzpatrick & Rothman (2002) may serve as an example for this article type. Meeting reports are usually commissioned, but reports and suggestions may also be submitted for the editors' consideration.
Maximum length (as a rule of thumb) : 3000 words of text (not including abstract, tables, figures, acknowledgments, references, and online-only material), with no more than a total of three tables and/or figures. The title should start with the phrase "A Meeting Report."
Double-blind peer review
Please note: Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences operates double-blind peer review. The following information should not be included in the main manuscript file, but should instead be uploaded as part of the covering letter:
- Title page
- Competing interests
- Authors’ contributions
- Acknowledgements
- Authors’ information